Re: MinGW patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: MinGW patch
Date
Msg-id 200309071540.h87FeXq05673@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MinGW patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Why does configure need to see those files?  Surely you don't need
> > configure to test the capabilities of our own source tree?
>
> Looking at the contents of src/include/port/win32, I would imagine the
> problem is configure will decide we don't HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H, etc.

Yep.  Can anyone suggest a better solution?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: MinGW patch
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever