Re: 64-bit pgsql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: 64-bit pgsql
Date
Msg-id 200309052100.h85L0HY18205@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 64-bit pgsql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> writes:
> > So I guess the problem lies in the Itanium port.  Or could I miss
> > something subtle here?
> 
> This strengthens my suspicion that we're not finding TAS code for
> the Itanium, but please see if you can strace or ktrace the postmaster
> to verify how many semget()s it tries to do.  With max_connections=10
> it should really do only one.
> 
> Alternatively, find out what symbols your compiler predeclares.
> If my theory is right then your pg_config_os.h file is failing to
> define HAS_TEST_AND_SET; why?

include/storage/s_lock.h has:
#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* AMD Opteron */

and 
#if defined(__ia64__) || defined(__ia64)

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Warning for missing createlang
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: FK type mismatches?