Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> What I'm wondering about is whether we are comparing the right number of
> >> bytes ... have both address structs been reported to have the same
> >> length? Maybe we need a min().
>
> > I disagree. If getsockname(), getpeername() or recvfrom() return
> > different address length's, it'd be more an indicator that the addresses
> > ARE different anyway.
>
> Hm, good point. But I still feel that we are jumping to a conclusion
> without understanding what's going on. I'd like to know *why* the
> addresses are different on Adam's machine, before we conclude that we
> mustn't try to check that they are the same.
Agreed. We should know exactly what is happening. My only point
earlier is that this has to be fixed for 7.4.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073