Re: NOTICE vs WARNING - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: NOTICE vs WARNING
Date
Msg-id 20030827124649.GD25066@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NOTICE vs WARNING  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: NOTICE vs WARNING
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:21:25 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> wrote:
> 
> I think that WARNING should be used for ALL things that have been
> deprecated.  eg. implicit FROM, the opaque business, and definitely
> unsupported and ignored synacies.

Implicit froms aren't depreciated yet. For deletes there isn't any alternative
syntax yet. There was some discussion about possible syntaxes, but nothing
was done in this regard for 7.4.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: NOTICE vs WARNING
Next
From: Kevin Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: Date input changed in 7.4 ?