Re: new psql \d command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: new psql \d command
Date
Msg-id 200308071629.h77GTvZ14328@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: new psql \d command  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: new psql \d command
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > It just seemed complex to figure out which operators needed parens and
> > which didn't.
> 
> The fact that the first attempt was wrong doesn't improve my faith in
> that code one bit ;-).  I don't want pg_dump invoking it, even as an
> option.  Someone will get burnt.

Yes, even if we get it right now, it might break in the future by a
change somewhere else, and we may not discover the breakage until it is
too late.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: When did we get to be so fast?
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: test