Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > It might be a bit risky getting pg_dump to use it though?
>
> I definitely don't want pg_dump using the pretty-print stuff ;-).
> I'm neutral on whether to use it in psql's \d commands.
I thought the pretty-printing stuff was designed specifically for psql
\d and third-party apps like pgadmin.
Let's face it, the non-pretty-printing output is "pretty" ugly, and
pretty-printing will improve that.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
