Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > I was afraid it was something like that. Can we leave the directory
> > structure as-is and just make the .o (and .d) files get built in the
> > upper directory, that is
> > gcc ... -o english_stem.o snowball/english_stem.c
>
> That will fail for a more basic reason: not all compilers support the -o
> option.
...jaw drops to ground...
I'm astounded. There are such compilers still in use?? Which ones?
--
Kevin Brown kevin@sysexperts.com
