Re: postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 200307301210.49034.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgresql.conf  (Ron <rstpierre@syscor.com>)
Responses Re: postgresql.conf  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Ron,

> I don't know if this is representative of other postgresql installs, but
> I would also put in my vote for the differentiation added, as these are
> not small machines but are multi-server boxes.

But how is the Multi-purpose configuration different from the Small Machine
configuration?    If the actual settings are the same, we just need to
explain somewhere what it means.

I'll argue pretty strongly against including a seperate MP configuration
because it would raise our number of suggested sets to 10 from 7.

--
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf
Next
From: Rajesh Kumar Mallah
Date:
Subject: Re: Why performance improvement on converting subselect