Tom Lane wrote:
> We need to think about whether this bug is serious enough to justify a
> quick 7.3.5 release. I'm leaning to the idea that it is not, because
> if it were, we'd have heard about it from the field before now. In
> pre-7.4 code there is only one instant in the lifespan of an index where
> the bug could occur, and then only if the index is created empty.
Agreed, I don't think 7.3.5 is warranted, but it would have been nice to
get this in 7.3.4. Let's keep our eyes open for maybe a 7.3.5 later.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
