Re: Replication/Failover/HA solution - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Ragnar Kjørstad
Subject Re: Replication/Failover/HA solution
Date
Msg-id 20030729151611.GB21461@vestdata.no
Whole thread Raw
In response to Replication/Failover/HA solution  (Renney Thomas <renney@cris.com>)
Responses Re: Replication/Failover/HA solution  (Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah@trade-india.com>)
Re: Replication/Failover/HA solution  (Dani Oderbolz <oderbolz@ecologic.de>)
List pgsql-admin
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:11:15PM -0400, Renney Thomas wrote:
> I am having a hard time selecting a Replication/Failover/HA solution for
> PGSQL. What is troubling is the number of solutions available in various
> states of development.  Does the fact that dbmirror and rserv appear in
> the contrib directory, mean that they should be looked upon with more
> legitimacy? Any suggestions?

One possibility is to run postgresql (regular postgresql - no patches
required) controlled by heartbeat (http://www.linux-ha.org/) on two
nodes. Heartbeat will then make sure that only one of the nodes are
active at any time.

You will have to put the databases on shared storage; either something
like a shared SCSI RAID, or a software replication device like drdb or
md+nbd.

Make sure you have proper fencing in place, so you don't end up in a
situation where both nodes are active and modifying your database.

You should probably subscribe to the linux-ha mailinglist if you want to
take this approach.



--
Ragnar Kjorstad

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres db corrupted ?
Next
From: "John P. Looney"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres db corrupted ?