Re: fix for new SUSET GUC variables - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: fix for new SUSET GUC variables
Date
Msg-id 200307212102.h6LL2Rb16573@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fix for new SUSET GUC variables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Aizaz Ahmed <aahmed@redhat.com> writes:
> > I believe when updating the GucContext enum, it is also necessary to
> > update the GucContext_names [] in backend/utils/misc/help_config.c.
> > The need to do this was supposed to be added as a comment to the guc.h
> > file, right about where GucContext is defined, but it seems as if that
> > part of the patch was not applied.
>
> I did not include that comment because it seemed misleading (that array
> is far from the only place that has to be adjusted when adding a new
> GucContext value) as well as distracting (GucContext_names is not
> exactly the most important thing to know about when trying to understand
> GucContext).

Comment removed.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: createlang/droplang fix
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [BUGS] pg_tables view definition incorrect??