Re: Is SQL silly as an RDBMS<->app interface? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Is SQL silly as an RDBMS<->app interface?
Date
Msg-id 20030714060501.GC18432@dcc.uchile.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is SQL silly as an RDBMS<->app interface?  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Responses Re: Is SQL silly as an RDBMS<->app interface?  (Peter Childs <blue.dragon@blueyonder.co.uk>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:54:55AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:

> SQL is only one possible relational query language.  It didn't
> become de facto standard until the mid- to late-80s.
>
> It is an outgrowth of SEQEL (Structured English QuEry Language),
> which was IBM's 1st try at a descriptive query language.  DEC
> had RDML (Relational Data Manipulation Language) to access it's
> RDBMS.  I'm sure that Burroughs, etc, had their own access methods,
> too.

Of course, in the context of a PostgreSQL list you can't forget QUEL and
PostQUEL, Ingres and POSTGRES query languages respectively.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Hay quien adquiere la mala costumbre de ser infeliz" (M. A. Evans)

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Is SQL silly as an RDBMS<->app interface?
Next
From: "listrec"
Date:
Subject: Re: select null + 0 question