Re: Is Postgres broken in Red Hat 9? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: Is Postgres broken in Red Hat 9?
Date
Msg-id 200307091000.32345.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is Postgres broken in Red Hat 9?  (Dragan Matic <gekko@eunet.yu>)
List pgsql-general
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 09:00, Dragan Matic wrote:
> This is from the Postgres Site:

> "In addition, this driver fixes an annoying problem with recent builds
> of PostgreSQL on Redhat systems that have a particularly long compiler
> version string that caused a buffer overflow resulting in a GPF on
> Windows upon connection to the database. "

This information should be updated, as this problem probably would occur on
any system using gcc 3.x, as that is the package with the long version
string.  It shouldn't be a Red Hat specific bug.

This issue should have been present on Red Hat 8.0 as well, since it's
virtually the same compiler.  IIRC, you said you went from RH 7.3 up.  7.3
used the much-maligned Red Hat-specific gcc 2.96, whose version string is
much shorter.  Test it yourself with 'gcc --version' and see what you get.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Sorting on fieldtype Time?
Next
From: Bjørn T Johansen
Date:
Subject: Re: Sorting on fieldtype Time?