Re: [PATCHES] Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection
Date
Msg-id 20030706194507.GB14993@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 15:29:37 -0400,
  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> 3. What should be the set of tested values?  I have it as
>    buffers: first to work of 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 50
>    connections: first to work of 100 50 40 30 20 10
> but we could certainly argue for different rules.

Should the default max number of connections first try something greater
than what Apache sets by default (256 for prefork, 400 for worker)?

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sergey
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.3.3 and Intel C compiler
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection