Re: cvs build failure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: cvs build failure
Date
Msg-id 200307020037.h620bU828245@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cvs build failure  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: cvs build failure  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I can see making a new bison required only when the version is *devel. 
> > That way, folks testing CVS and even the *devel snapshots would need a
> > new bison, but our normal users wouldn't.
> 
> Even then, if they're using a snapshot they shouldn't need it.
> 
> Perhaps a combination of your idea and Alvaro's: set things up so that
> we fail only when bison is actually invoked by the makefiles, plus
> provide a way to override the version check if it's wrong.

I don't see a reason to have a flag to turn it off --- has anyone
reported that the version check failed?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: cvs build failure
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum bug