On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 07:27:30 -0500,
Chris Boget <chris@wild.net> wrote:
> > Am Mon, 2003-06-30 um 13.56 schrieb Chris Boget:
> > > which, sadly, is greek to me. The problem is that the above query
> > > takes very close to 12 seconds to execute. Is there a better way I
> > > could write the query? The number of rows in each table are as
> > > follows:
> > First of all you should try: VACUUM ANALYZE;
>
> What was that supposed to tell me?
It was supposed to make sure that the planner had reliable data from
which to plan your query.
When sending a query plan to the lists, you want to do an explain analyze
so that we can see what really happens when your query is executed as
well as what the planner thinks is going to happen.
The plan for your query had a fairly small number of rows for it to take
12 seconds to run the query. This is one hint that an analyze might not
have been done.
