Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I sure want two-phase commit. I don't remember it as being rejected,
> > and we certainly need it, independent of replication.
>
> Is 2PC a real-world solution to any real-world problem? I have never
> seen a satisfactory explanation of what you do when you've reported that
> you're ready to commit and no confirmation ever comes back. Sooner or
> later you must violate the protocol in one direction or the other (ie,
> commit without confirmation or roll back in violation of your promise
> of being able to commit).
>
> I think it's a cool-sounding phrase that does not actually work in
> practice.
I think 2PC can be used to build more complex features, like using dblink
for cross-db modification queries.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
