Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL libraries - PThread Support, but - Mailing list pgsql-patches
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL libraries - PThread Support, but |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200306131552.h5DFqfT15360@candle.pha.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL libraries - PThread Support, but (Lee Kindness <lkindness@csl.co.uk>) |
Responses |
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL libraries - PThread Support, but
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL libraries - PThread Support, but |
List | pgsql-patches |
Lee, I have a question about this code: char *pqStrerror(int errnum, char *strerrbuf, size_t buflen) { #if defined HAVE_STRERROR_R /* reentrant strerror_r is available */ strerror_r(errnum, strerrbuf, buflen); return strerrbuf; #elif defined HAVE_NONPOSIX_STRERROR_R /* broken (well early POSIX draft) strerror_r() which returns 'char *' */ return strerror_r(errnum, strerrbuf, buflen); #else /* no strerror_r() available, just use strerror */ return strerror(errnum); #endif } Why do we have to care about HAVE_NONPOSIX_STRERROR_R? Can't we just use the HAVE_STRERROR_R code in all cases? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lee Kindness wrote: Content-Description: message body text > Patch attached, along with new libpq-reentrant.c and libpq-reentrant.h > files for src/interfaces/libpq. > > Also at http://services.csl.co.uk/postgresql/ > > Thanks, Lee. > > Lee Kindness writes: > > Ok guys, I propose that the new libpq diff and 2 source files which > > i'll soon send to pgsql-patches is applied to the source. This diff is > > a cleaned up version of the previous version with the wrapper > > functions moved out into their own file and more comments added. Also > > the use of crypt_r() has been removed (not worth the effort), the > > cpp defines have been renamed to be consistent with each other and > > Tom's concerns with loose #defines has been partly addressed. > > > > This diff does not include any configure changes. I plan to tackle > > this separately ASAP, and hopefully produce something more acceptable. > > > > I will add checks for appropriate compiler thread flags (for compiling > > libpq, and alow the removal of #defines in libpq-reentrant.h), and > > link flags & libs (for a planned threaded libpq test program and > > renentrant ecpg library). If a thread environment is found then check > > for the reentrant functions will be done. > > > > Looking at various open source projects configure.in files there seems > > to be little commonality in the thread test macros (telp gratefully > > accepted!), I currently think that something like the approach used by > > glib is most suitable (switch on OS). > > > > All sound acceptable? > > > > Thanks, Lee. > > > > Peter Eisentraut writes: > > > Lee Kindness writes: > > > > > > > Patches attached to make libpq thread-safe, now uses strerror_r(), > > > > gethostbyname_r(), getpwuid_r() and crypt_r() where available. Where > > > > strtok() was previously used strchr() is now used. > > > > > > AC_TRY_RUN tests are prohibited. Also, try to factor out some of these > > > huge tests into separate macros and put them into config/c-library.m4. > > > And it would be nice if there was some documentation about what was > > > checked for. If you just want to check whether gethostbyname_r() has 5 or > > > 6 arguments you can do that in half the space. > [ Attachment, skipping... ] [ Attachment, skipping... ] [ Attachment, skipping... ] -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
pgsql-patches by date: