Re: FW: [ADMIN] Shared_buffers and kernel parameters, tuning - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: FW: [ADMIN] Shared_buffers and kernel parameters, tuning
Date
Msg-id 20030610172142.GA17801@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FW: [ADMIN] Shared_buffers and kernel parameters, tuning  ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 21:26:49 +0530,
  Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> wrote:
>
> Point is we should be able to say RTFC rather than RTFA as that would get a DBA
> single place to look at.  I agree that no amount of simplicity is enough but
> still..:-)

I believe there was discussion a couple of months ago that came to a
different conclusion. There was concern about having documenation that
wasn't in the documentation and have to versions of essentially the
same information that both need to be maintained.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: FW: [ADMIN] Shared_buffers and kernel parameters, tuning
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list