On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:35:10 +0200, Eivind Kvedalen <eivindkv@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>
> Ok. What I actually had in mind was whether the optimizer would remove the
> ORDER BY clause completely or not, as it isn't used in the top-level
> SELECT query, and SQL doesn't in general guarantee ordered rows back
> unless there's an ORDER BY in the top-level SELECT (I haven't read the SQL
> standard, so I might very well be wrong here).
Allowing ordering in subselects is a feature (mostly for use with LIMIT)
and won't be removed because it isn't a top level select.
