Kevin,
How about creating a new index just on column6?
That should be much more effective than the multicolumn
index.
Regards,
Nikolaus
On Thu, 29 May 2003 08:58:07 -0500, "Kevin Schroeder"
wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm running a simple query on a table and I'm
> getting a very long
> response time. The table has 56,000 rows in it. It
> has a full text field,
> but it is not being referenced in this query. The
> query I'm running is
>
> select row_key, column1, column2, column3, column4,
> column5 from table1
> where column6 = 1 order by column3 desc limit 21;
>
> There is an index on the table
>
> message_index btree (column6, column3, column7)
>
> Column 3 is a date type, column 6 is an integer and
> column 7 is unused in
> this query.
>
> The total query time is 6 seconds, but I can bring
that
> down to 4.5 if I
> append "offset 0" to the end of the query. By
checking
> query using "explain
> analyze" it shows that it is using the index.
>
> If anyone has any ideas as to why the query is taking
> so long and what I can
> do to make it more efficient I would love to know.
>
> Thanks
> Kevin
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
