Re: Server error - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Erik Ronström
Subject Re: Server error
Date
Msg-id 20030507104838.16633.qmail@web13806.mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Server error  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Server error  (Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
Re: Server error  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi again,

thanks for the answers.

 --- Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> writes:
> > Sig 11 means you have bad memory or CPU, about 99.9% of the time.
>
> In my part of the universe, about 99% of the time it means you've
> found a software bug ;-) ... especially if you can create an example
> case that is reproducible on another machine.  Erik, can you wrap up
> a test case?

99% + 99.9%, that makes 198.9 percent :-)

Unfortunatly, the function depends heavily on the database structure. I
tried to extract the essential parts to reproduce the problem within a
small test DB, but then everything worked just fine! But I will post an
example when I get one...

> And which PG version are you running, anyway?

7.2.1. I've heard it has some bugs, but the guy running the server
refuses to upgrade to _anything_ that isn't cleared by Debian. 7.3
should have been cleared some days ago, but it hasn't, don't know why.

Best regards
Erik

__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Plus
For a better Internet experience
http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Cancelling a command.
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Small bug in postgres' ./configure script and invalid