Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date
Msg-id 200303212252.h2LMqsF20161@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
List pgsql-hackers
I was thinking if we had a SET PERMANENT that couldn't be changed,
interfaces that want to control variables could set them perminantly,
and others could let users control it.

Actually, if we reported change to the client, the interface could
override any change the user made --- just an idea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Man, I lost another vote!  :-)
> 
> Happens to us all ;-)
> 
> But this discussion is far from over ... not that many people have
> weighed in yet.  Also, even if autocommit's fate is sealed, we still
> have to think about how to handle the other variables Barry identified
> as trouble spots.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: installcheck failure