Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 18:55, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Does the change worth the trouble ?
> > Please don't break BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY easily.
>
> If it's important enough, we can provide a GUC option for it.
>
> My guess is that a GUC option isn't needed, but then again we've been
> criticized for disregarding backward compatibility in the past...
I think our policy is going to be that GUC backward compatibility
options have to be asked for during beta, unless it is obvious.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
