Re: No entry to pg_hba.conf 10.17.11.16 - Mailing list pgadmin-support

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: No entry to pg_hba.conf 10.17.11.16
Date
Msg-id 200303121112.05719.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: No entry to pg_hba.conf 10.17.11.16  ("Roman Fail" <rfail@posportal.com>)
List pgadmin-support
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 11:00, Roman Fail wrote:
> I'm not a TCP/IP networking expert, but I'm pretty certain that 10.x.x.x
> addresses are the very definition of a private non-routable Class A
> network.  Which means the subnet mask should be 255.0.0.0.

> 255.255.255.0 is the mask for Class C networks, which for private networks
> are generally defined as 192.168.x.x.

Minor correction.  With CIDR you can use any netmask with any private IP
ranges.  Using 10.x.x.x within an organization allows tremendous flexibility
in subnetting.  I use that here, to great effect.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11


pgadmin-support by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: No entry to pg_hba.conf 10.17.11.16
Next
From: Fabiano
Date:
Subject: Re: No entry to pg_hba.conf 10.17.11.16