Re: Numbering of the next release: 8.0 vs 7.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: Numbering of the next release: 8.0 vs 7.4
Date
Msg-id 200303121015.30713.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Numbering of the next release: 8.0 vs 7.4  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: Numbering of the next release: 8.0 vs 7.4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 09:55, Robert Treat wrote:
> Personally I think Justin is a little off base with his criteria, since
> I see the FE/BE protocol changes as the real differentiator between an
> 8.0 and 7.4. Everyone is effected by a FE/BE protocol change, not nearly
> so many are effected by either win32 or PITR. And think of this crazy
> scenario: We release an 8.0 with PITR, then need either a 8.1 or a 9.0
> with a FE/BE overhaul, then need a possible 10.0 because we've added
> win32... yuk.

FWIW, the 6.4 protocol change didn't force a move from 6.3.2 to 7.0.
-- 
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Numbering of the next release: 8.0 vs 7.4