Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command
Date
Msg-id 20030220.101701.07643719.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Dave Cramer <dave@fastcrypt.com> writes:
> > Ok, if a patch were submitted to the parser to allow the syntax in
> > question would it be considered?
> 
> I would vote against it ... but that's only one vote.

I would vote against it too. Please don't add a none-standard syntax
any more (I think we got enough lesson from "foo = NULL compatibilty"
with MS products).
--
Tatsuo Ishii


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Re: The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one
Next
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier