Re: The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one
Date
Msg-id 200302192153.h1JLrnA14845@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one  (mlw <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
mlw wrote:
> >I raised the possibility of moving the pid file only last week.  Tom
> >pointed out that it acts as a lock on the database to prevent two
> >postmasters' trying to manage the same database.  As such it should NOT
> >be a configurable parameter.
> >
> This is a different PID file. Sorry, this one is specifically for FHS 
> systems. The postmaster.pid file, as used by PostgreSQL remains in the 
> data directory.

Uh, how does this work if you don't do an FHS install --- where does it
put this FHS postmaster.pid file?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mike Aubury
Date:
Subject: Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command
Next
From: Tilo Schwarz
Date:
Subject: Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: [pgsql-advocacy]