Re: Offering tuned config files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Offering tuned config files
Date
Msg-id 20030215221429.J63048-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Offering tuned config files  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
No, not really - I can do some more testing with pgbench to see what
happens though...I'll do it on monday

Chris

On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at> writes:
> > In postgresql.conf.sample-writeheavy you have:
> >     commit_delay = 10000
> > Is this still needed with "ganged WAL writes"?  Tom?
>
> I doubt that the current options for grouped commits are worth anything
> at the moment.  Chris, do you have any evidence backing up using
> commit_delay with 7.3?
>
>             regards, tom lane
>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Curt Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] More benchmarking of wal_buffers
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: stats_command_string default?