Tom,
> Is it possible that the function's owner has been dropped from pg_shadow?
No, the function owner is the database owner ... and also the same user=20
calling pg_dump.
> How about dropped return type, etc? pg_dump used to use inner joins to
> collect info about database objects, meaning it would silently miss
> objects that were missing expected collateral objects.
Return type is TEXT, so I think that's OK too. However, this database do=
es=20
have some pretty complex dependancies.
I just tested. This is still a bug in 7.3.0. I will download and test 7.=
3.2=20
now.
--=20
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
