Re: PGP signing releases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: PGP signing releases
Date
Msg-id 20030205040028.GA11467@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PGP signing releases  (Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 23:13:47 +0100, Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be> wrote:
> 
> So a figerprint and all the hash/digest function have no purpose
> at all?

The purpose of both is to reduce the amount of material in a way that
makes it hard to generate some other material that would result in the
same hash or fingerprint. This allows you to reduce the cost of transmitting
the data or making computations (in particular signing) on the data.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2