Re: PGP signing releases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: PGP signing releases
Date
Msg-id 20030202222122.E16840@hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to PGP signing releases  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Responses Re: PGP signing releases  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
Re: PGP signing releases  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: PGP signing releases  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Re: PGP signing releases  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Neil Conway wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I think we should PGP sign all the "official" packages that are provided
> for download from the various mirror sites. IMHO, this is important
> because:
>
> - ensuring that end users can trust PostgreSQL is an important part to
> getting the product used in mission-critical applications, as I'm sure
> you all know. Part of that is producing good software; another part is
> ensuring that users can trust that the software we put out hasn't been
> tampered with.

right, that is why we started to provide md5 checksums ...

> I'd volunteer to do the work myself, except that it's pretty closely
> intertwined with the release process itself...

well, if you want to tell me the steps, I'll consider it ...



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Curt Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_hba.conf hostmask.
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: PGP signing releases