Re: PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Manuel Bouyer
Subject Re: PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS
Date
Msg-id 20030201223133.GD2172@antioche.eu.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:27:59PM -0600, Greg Copeland wrote:
> That was going to be my question too.
> 
> I thought NFS didn't have some of the requisite file system behaviors
> (locking, flushing, etc. IIRC) for PostgreSQL to function correctly or
> reliably.

I don't know what locking sheme PostgreSQL use, but in theory it should
be possible to use it over NFS:
- a fflush()/msync() should work the same way on a NFS filesystem as on a local filesystem, provided the client and
serverimplements the NFS protocol properly
 
- locking via temp files works over NFS, again provided the client and server implements the NFS protocol properly
(thisis why you can safely read your mailbox over NFS, for example). If PostgreSQL uses flock or fcntl, it's a
problem.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>    NetBSD: 24 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Caffeinate The World
Date:
Subject: Re: [OpenFTS-general] relor and relkov
Next
From: "Greg A. Woods"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS