Re: Request for qualified column names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Request for qualified column names
Date
Msg-id 200301282200.h0SM0iK01186@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Request for qualified column names  (Dave Cramer <dave@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: Request for qualified column names  ("Reggie Burnett" <rykr@bellsouth.net>)
Re: Request for qualified column names  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dave Cramer says it is needed for the jdbc spec, somehow. It seems kind
of odd so I don't want to make too complex an implementation.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> 
> > My idea on this after chat with Dave was to add a GUC option that puts
> > the schema.table.column name as the default column label, rather than
> > just the column name.
> 
> Can someone explain why this is needed at all?  There is a reason why the
> SQL standard does not provide for this information: it's not well defined.
> Are you trying to make up a poor substitute for updatable views?
> 
> -- 
> Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net
> 
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix for log_min_error_messages
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Request for qualified column names