> > As part of checkpoint, we discard some WAL files. To do that, we must
> > first be sure that all the dirty buffers we have written to the kernel
> > are actually on the disk. That is why the sync() is required.
>
> What we really need is something better than sync(), viz flush all dirty
> buffers to disk *and* wait till they're written. But sync() and sleep
> for awhile is the closest portable approximation.
Are you saying that fsync() might not wait untill the IO completes?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
