Hello,
I am just wondering why Postgresql allow to drop a user without checking if he has any created tables/objects with him? Is it going to be optimized in the future release?
Regards.
Helen L.
Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> wrote:
On 7 Jan 2003 at 10:29, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dan Langille" writes:
> > I am forwarding this on behalf of bain@tcsn.co.za who is at a client
> > site and cannot email.
>
> > I did a search and found a mail stating that its possibly related to
> > a deleted user having ownership of the table.
> > "http://www.geocrawler.com/mail/msg.php3?msg_id=5653159&list=10" I
> > checked and indeed the owner that created the table no longer
> > exists. Unfortunately I have no idea who that user was.
>
> You don't need to know. Get the old owner's sysid with
> SELECT relowner FROM pg_class WHERE relname = 'busted_table';
> then create a user with the appropriate sysid:
> CREATE USER foo WITH SYSID nnn;
I think that's pretty much what he did:
1.) psql dbname
2.) select * from pg_table;
this lists all th detaild of the tables in the DB.
some might have owner set to "unknown (sysid=xx)"
this is the problem. (note the sysid number)
3.) createuser -i xx (sysid user of the unknown table owner)
4.) pg_dump / pg_dumpall
> Once you've done that, consider upgrading to a more recent Postgres.
> It's been a good long while since pg_dump would choke on this
> situation.
FWIW, I think upgrade is the reason for the pg_dump.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable.
Sign up now
