Re: minor changes in psql's \encoding command - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: minor changes in psql's \encoding command
Date
Msg-id 200301050546.h055k6N24019@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: minor changes in psql's \encoding command  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: minor changes in psql's \encoding command  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Here is an email from December 15 reporting the problem.  Seems we need
to address it somehow.  Should we throw a warning when the do it?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> I said:
> > I'd prefer to just document that PQclientEncoding is untrustworthy if
> > the client sets the encoding directly (rather than via PGCLIENTENCODING
> > or PQsetClientEncoding), and similarly that psql's \encoding is not
> > trustworthy if one goes behind its back.
>
> On looking closer, both libpq and psql assume that their current
> internal encoding settings accurately describe the strings they get
> from the backend.  So hacking up PQclientEncoding() wouldn't be enough
> to fix all the problems anyway.
>
> I think we need to document that doing "SET client_encoding" directly is
> hazardous to your health with either of these interfaces, and perhaps
> with others as well.  Anyone know how JDBC and ODBC deal with encoding?
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: minor changes in psql's \encoding command
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: minor changes in psql's \encoding command