On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, elein wrote:
>
> Then this is a distinction between the trigger name and
> the constraint name? The trigger name is RI_ConstraintTrigger_437278
> (or some such oid). The trigger is the implementation of the constraint
> so the trigger name is what I had expected to see.
There are three triggers for the constraint though. It needs a name
separate from those of the triggers (or it could pick one of the triggers
to name it after, but that seems just as confusing to me).
> Almost all of the system generated names, sequences, triggers, etc,
> have constructed names. $n for constrain names seems like an anomaly.
I think it's been that way for check constraints for a long time unless I
remember incorrectly. When the change was made to actually name the
constraint (rather than naming them all unnamed) I figure the current
naming convention was carried across.
