Here's something that's been bothering me for a while... Perhaps this
is correct behaviour, but I can't quite see how. This does not happen
if I replace the FETCHes by MOVEs.
Here's the reference case:
jtv=> begin;
BEGIN
jtv=> declare c cursor for select * from events;
DECLARE CURSOR
jtv=> fetch 3 in c;year | event
------+------------------2010 | A Space Oddyssey2010 | Oddyssey Two2038 | time_t overflow
(3 rows)
jtv=> move -3 in c;
MOVE 2
jtv=> fetch 3 in c;year | event
------+------------------2010 | A Space Oddyssey2010 | Oddyssey Two2038 | time_t overflow
(3 rows)
jtv=> end;
COMMIT
Okay, since that "move -3" claims to have moved only 2 rows backwards, I
tried the same but moving backwards by only 2 rows. This gives me the
same response for the MOVE, but my cursor evidently doesn't end up in
the same place:
jtv=> begin;
BEGIN
jtv=> declare c cursor for select * from events;
DECLARE CURSOR
jtv=> fetch 3 in c;year | event
------+------------------2010 | A Space Oddyssey2010 | Oddyssey Two2038 | time_t overflow
(3 rows)
jtv=> move -2 in c;
MOVE 2
jtv=> fetch 3 in c;year | event
------+-----------------2010 | Oddyssey Two2038 | time_t overflow1971 | jtv
(3 rows)
jtv=> end;
COMMIT
This makes it a bit hard for me to figure out just how far I moved my
cursor backwards! Moving by BACKWARD ALL will give me the same result
as moving by -3.
Is this behaviour intentional? If not, can it be fixed?
Jeroen
