Re: [BUGS] Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to show - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Ross J. Reedstrom
Subject Re: [BUGS] Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to show
Date
Msg-id 20021211192650.GC29886@wallace.ece.rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to show  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:27:05PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > OK, new output attached.  Does the HTML section look silly now with only
> > two entries?
>
> Yeah.  I think it should be folded into "Formatting", since it really is
> only an output-formatting option.
>
> I have a problem with the "Query Buffer" section, also: I don't think
> \i, \o, etc have anything to do with the query buffer.  Could we split

In fact, I wish \i _did_ interact with the query buffer: it'd make \e
a lot more useful, IMHO.

Ross

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: pgsql ALTER command tab completion
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: libpq doc improvement