Re: Size for vacuum_mem - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Francisco Reyes
Subject Re: Size for vacuum_mem
Date
Msg-id 200212051731.gB5HV8o14921@mx2.drf.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Size for vacuum_mem  (Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com>)
Responses Re: Size for vacuum_mem
List pgsql-general
On 4 Dec 2002, Neil Conway wrote:

> > Currently a vacuum full takes 3+ hours and very soon the amount of data
> > will increase.
>
> Do you need to use VACUUM FULL?

I have a very large turnover ratio.
For some tables I delete/reload the whole table daily (tables in the 500K
to 1.5 Million records), while other tables I delete/reload about 1/3 (ie
7 Million records table I delete/copy 1.5 Million records).

The reason for the delete/copy is that the data is coming from a system
where there is now way to tell what was added, changed since the last
update. So I use date ranges for some tables and do entire tables for
others.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.3 no longer using indexes for LIKE queries
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: passwords in pg_shadow (duplicate).