Re: Solaris still failing RC2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Solaris still failing RC2
Date
Msg-id 200211252149.gAPLnLD27418@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Solaris still failing RC2  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Responses Re: Solaris still failing RC2
List pgsql-hackers
Please try RC2;  this is fixed there.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

scott.marlowe wrote:
> Now, Solaris seems to be running all the tests but failing something like 
> 29 out of 85 of them.
> 
> With a vanilla ./configure;make, I get this on a make check:
> 
> ============== running regression test queries        ==============
> parallel group (13 tests):  char int8 oid int2 int4 varchar name boolean 
> text float4 float8 bit numeric
>      boolean              ... ok
>      char                 ... ok
>      name                 ... ok
>      varchar              ... ok
>      text                 ... ok
>      int2                 ... ok
>      int4                 ... ok
>      int8                 ... ok
>      oid                  ... ok
>      float4               ... ok
>      float8               ... ok
>      bit                  ... ok
>      numeric              ... ok
> test strings              ... ok
> test numerology           ... ok
> parallel group (20 tests):  date interval comments lseg path box time 
> point polygon abstime inet circle tinterval reltime timetz timestamp 
> timestamptz type_sanity opr_sanity oidjoins
>      point                ... ok
>      lseg                 ... ok
>      box                  ... ok
>      path                 ... ok
>      polygon              ... ok
>      circle               ... ok
>      date                 ... ok
>      time                 ... ok
>      timetz               ... ok
>      timestamp            ... ok
>      timestamptz          ... ok
>      interval             ... ok
>      abstime              ... ok
>      reltime              ... ok
>      tinterval            ... ok
>      inet                 ... ok
>      comments             ... ok
>      oidjoins             ... ok
>      type_sanity          ... ok
>      opr_sanity           ... FAILED
> test geometry             ... ok
> test horology             ... ok
> test insert               ... ok
> test create_function_1    ... ok
> test create_type          ... ok
> test create_table         ... ok
> test create_function_2    ... ok
> test copy                 ... ok
> parallel group (7 tests):  create_aggregate create_operator triggers 
> constraints inherit vacuum create_misc
>      constraints          ... FAILED
>      triggers             ... FAILED
>      create_misc          ... ok
>      create_aggregate     ... FAILED
>      create_operator      ... FAILED
>      inherit              ... FAILED
>      vacuum               ... FAILED
> parallel group (2 tests):  create_view create_index
>      create_index         ... FAILED
>      create_view          ... FAILED
> test sanity_check         ... ok
> test errors               ... ok
> test select               ... ok
> parallel group (16 tests):  select_implicit random select_distinct 
> select_into transactions union select_distinct_on portals arrays 
> select_having case subselect aggregates join hash_index btree_index      
> select_into          ... ok
>      select_distinct      ... ok
>      select_distinct_on   ... ok
>      select_implicit      ... FAILED
>      select_having        ... ok
>      subselect            ... ok
>      union                ... FAILED
>      case                 ... ok
>      join                 ... ok
>      aggregates           ... FAILED
>      transactions         ... ok
>      random               ... failed (ignored)
>      portals              ... ok
>      arrays               ... ok
>      btree_index          ... ok
>      hash_index           ... ok
> test privileges           ... ok
> test misc                 ... FAILED
> parallel group (5 tests):  select_views portals_p2 cluster rules 
> foreign_key
>      select_views         ... FAILED
>      portals_p2           ... ok
>      rules                ... FAILED
>      foreign_key          ... FAILED
>      cluster              ... FAILED
> parallel group (11 tests):  prepare truncate copy2 temp domain limit 
> conversion rangefuncs without_oid plpgsql alter_table
>      limit                ... FAILED
>      plpgsql              ... FAILED
>      copy2                ... FAILED
>      temp                 ... ok
>      domain               ... FAILED
>      rangefuncs           ... FAILED
>      prepare              ... FAILED
>      without_oid          ... ok
>      conversion           ... FAILED
>      truncate             ... ok
>      alter_table          ... FAILED
> ============== shutting down postmaster               ==============
> 
> =====================================================
>  26 of 89 tests failed, 1 of these failures ignored.
> =====================================================
> 
> The differences that caused some tests to fail can be viewed in the
> file `./regression.diffs'.  A copy of the test summary that you see
> above is saved in the file `./regression.out'.
> 
> make[2]: *** [check] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/home/smarlowe/postgresql-7.3rc2/src/test/regress'
> make[1]: *** [check] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/smarlowe/postgresql-7.3rc2/src/test'
> make: *** [check] Error 2
> 
> If you'd like the output the of the -x version, let me know.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Solaris still failing RC2
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Solaris still failing RC2