Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Oh, hold, I now see that clusterdb _can_ do all databases, just like
> > vacuumdb. Seems we should keep it. Peter?
>
> Interesting. Do we recommend that users routine recluster all their
> databases?
>
> Perhaps we need a more general client-side tool to run some command on all
> databases, so we could get rid of clusterdb, vacuumdb, reindexdb,
> mycommandofthedaydb, etc.
Yes, I think that makes sense. I think we need to keep clusterdb
_until_ we get a more general solution.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
