Re: RC1? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Patrick Welche
Subject Re: RC1?
Date
Msg-id 20021114185352.G18637@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RC1?  (Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:13:56PM +0000, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 07:53:00PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> > 
> > > We can't just wait around indefinitely for port reports that may or may
> > > not ever appear.  In any case, most of the "<7.3" entries in the list
> > > seem to be various flavors of *BSD; I think it's unlikely we broke
> > > those ...
> > 
> > Note that we have *zero* reports for any flavor of NetBSD and OpenBSD.
> > That is highly suspicious, and I would not venture a guess about how
> > likely it is they're broken.


PostgreSQL 7.3b1 on i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6H, compiled by GCC 2.95.3
PostgreSQL 7.4devel on i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6K, compiled by GCC 2.95.3

I in fact get geometry.out rather than geometry-positive-zeros.out, but I
think you get the former when you use libm387.so.0 instead of libm.so.0
which isn't exactly the general case for NetBSD, though I have only one
NetBSD/i386 box which can't make use of libm387 (it's a 486SX25)

The 7.4devel was with source from Nov 9 12:27 GMT, so I think rather close
to 7.3, and again with source from just now.

Cheers,

Patrick


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: RC1?
Next
From: Scott Shattuck
Date:
Subject: Re: create or replace view