Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Don't we still need the dllinit.c file?
>
> Sure looks like it to me: see src/makefiles/Makefile.win. Bruce,
> please put that back, and the Makefile for it too.
I removed those files a long time ago:
revision 1.10
date: 2002/07/16 05:46:36; author: momjian; state: dead; lines: +0 -0
Move few remaining src/utils files to backend/port so everything is in
one place. Everything may be moved to src/utils eventually.
I re-added /src/utils just so I could get getopt.c back. The removal
was just re-removing /utils. However, I now don't understand these
commits:
revision 1.12
date: 2002/10/30 01:15:51; author: momjian; state: dead; lines: +0 -0
Remove /src/utils. Is final cleanup of getopt.c resurection.
----------------------------
revision 1.11
date: 2002/07/27 20:10:05; author: petere; state: Exp; lines: +0 -0
Assemble portability modules into libpgport library.
Some makefile simplifications.
The top was was me removing the files, but I don't understand 1.11. We
peter readding the files? Why didn't I have a /utils directory here?
Why do we have successful cygin builds? I am confused.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
