Re: New lock types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: New lock types
Date
Msg-id 20021005195351.7272236f.alvherre@atentus.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New lock types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: New lock types
List pgsql-hackers
En Fri, 04 Oct 2002 17:58:06 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escribió:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@atentus.com> writes:
> > I'm looking at implementing the btree reorganizer described in "On-line
> > reorganization of sparsely-...", ACM SIGMOD proceedings 1996, by Zou and
> > Salzberg.

The title is "On-line reorganization of sparsely-populated B+-trees".
My purpose is to implement the reorganizer so that B+-trees can be
compacted concurrently with other uses of the index.

> > It seems to me I'll have to add some amount of lock types
> > in the lock manager.  Does that bother you?
>
> Such as?

There are three new lock modes: R, RX and RS (Reorganizer, Reorganizer
Exclusive and Reorganizer Shared).  Actually, they are not new lock
types; rather, new objects on which locks should be obtained before
using the index pages.

But there's some work to do before that.  I need to make the nbtree code
actually use its free page list.  That is, new pages for splits should
be taken from the free page, or a new page should be created if there
are none; also, deleting the last element from a page should put it into the
free page list.  I'm looking at that code now.  Let me know if you think
there's something I should know about this.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
"El sudor es la mejor cura para un pensamiento enfermo" (Bardia)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Correction re existing WAL behavior
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Analysis of ganged WAL writes