Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> It gave me the log all the way up to the 1.64 revision with the REL7_3_STABLE
> label assigned to revision 1.64.0.2
>
> Revision 1.64 apparently backing out my patch which made 1.63.
>
> I had a brain wave and did the cvs log command which was what lead me to try
> specifying revisions. As I say it looks like a lack of knowledge about how cvs
> works for these things. I always thought it worked like RCS and gave a diff
> against the latest checked in but obviously not.
>
> BTW, I've found Neil Conway's patch for this file, email dated 25th Sept., I
> can forward it or apply it and include the changes along with whatever I do for
> my next submission, which ever you'd prefer. I'd suggest it's easy to let me
> apply and submit it due to overlaps.
>
Sure, sounds good.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
