Justin Clift wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> <snip>
> > I agree with Lamar that upgrading is a very difficult process right now.
> > Requiring huge amounts of disk space and database downtime to do
> > dump/restore is in some cases too high a price to pay. So maybe the
> > upgrading process should be observed instead of wasting time on people
> > trying to stay behind because of the price of that process.
>
> As a "simple for the user approach", would it be
> too-difficult-to-bother-with to add to the postmaster an ability to
> start up with the data files from the previous version, for it to
> recognise an old data format automatically, then for it to do the
> conversion process of the old data format to the new one before going
> any further?
>
> Sounds like a pain to create initially, but nifty in the end.
Yes, we could, but if we are going to do that, we may as well just
automate the dump/reload.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
