Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues
Date
Msg-id 200209170605.g8H65eZ02461@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Proposal for resolving casting issues  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> We've been discussing this stuff in fits and starts for months now, but
> nothing satisfactory has been arrived at.  I've concluded that part of
> the problem is that we are trying to force the system's behavior into
> a model that is too limiting: we need more than an implicit/explicit cast
> distinction.  Accordingly, I suggest we bite the bullet and make it happen.
> (Note that I've resigned myself to having to do an initdb for 7.3beta2.)

I was reading my backlog of email and thinking, "Oh, things are shaping
up well", then I hit this message.  Let me try to collect open items
tomorrow and get a plan together.  I have caught up on my email.  I am
heading to bed.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues