Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?
Date
Msg-id 200209101721.g8AHLBg29786@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Jore <josh@greentechnologist.org> writes:
> > So I've finished reading Jeffery Friedl's _Mastering Regular Expressions_
> > and while I don't need regex in PostgreSQL I know I'll do it for something
> > - eventually. The book makes a distinction between DFA, POSIX NFA and
> > Traditional NFA and then ascribes some properties and behaviours to each.
> > So what sort does PostgreSQL have?
>
> Well, you could read the code (src/backend/regex), or you could apply
> the tests that Friedl suggests to distinguish the type of an unknown
> engine ...
>
> My guess is that it's an NFA, but I dunno if Spencer did the POSIX
> semantics or not.

I am continuing to talk to Henry about getting a newer version of his
regex library. He is working on it but is not yet finished.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: ???Varchar()
Next
From: "Johnson, Shaunn"
Date:
Subject: parsing column info